Patagonia Review
So my time in Patagonia was not exactly what I had in mind. I had hoped to go down to the end of the world at Tierra Del Fuego, see the Perito Moreno glacier crash down into Lago Argentino at El Calafate, and take the classic touristy snaps with the sharp peaks of the Torres del Paine.
Unfortunately, it was not to be. The thing about Patagonia is that it's very expensive. I knew it wouldn't be cheap, but I hadn't realised just how costly it would be. Transport is a huge factor, with long, expensive overnight buses needed to get to new places. When you get there, you also normally need to get buses or rentals to the attractions. Add to that the expense of staying in what is basically a string of tourist towns, and you're looking at a serious bill before you've even seen anything.
That said, I did have a fantastic time in the bits I could see. I never thought I would see as many penguins in 5 lifetimes as I did in Puerto Madryn in one afternoon, and the hikes and experiences I had in the Lake District and Bariloche will be treasured memories. The hardest part was the choice not to go to the far south, but I had a great time in the parts I did see.
Tell you what though, 90% of Patagonia is really, really, really boring.
I had images of the Andes in my head when I first headed south, and was very disappointed when the sun rose on my first long haul bus to see endless scrubby plains for hours on end. And it was the same everywhere else. Once you got into the mountains things picked up again, but you trade that view for a longer journey time winding through those roads.
It's such a wild and inhospitable place that even the greediest European settlers all but gave up on colonising the area until the late 19th century. The area was named after the 'Patagons', giants reportedly found in the area and given a name from a classical legend. It's likely they just encountered some of the fairly tall Tehuelche natives: not giants by any means, but at over 6 feet, much taller than your average European of the time.
Overall, I would say that Patagonia was a great way to start the trip. However, I am annoyed that I ended up leaving some of the best stones unturned. In my head I am already planning another trip there, starting in Rio or BA but carrying a tent, winter gear and camp stove for a serious hiking adventure. Who's with me?
Unfortunately, it was not to be. The thing about Patagonia is that it's very expensive. I knew it wouldn't be cheap, but I hadn't realised just how costly it would be. Transport is a huge factor, with long, expensive overnight buses needed to get to new places. When you get there, you also normally need to get buses or rentals to the attractions. Add to that the expense of staying in what is basically a string of tourist towns, and you're looking at a serious bill before you've even seen anything.
![]() |
Get a room you two |
That said, I did have a fantastic time in the bits I could see. I never thought I would see as many penguins in 5 lifetimes as I did in Puerto Madryn in one afternoon, and the hikes and experiences I had in the Lake District and Bariloche will be treasured memories. The hardest part was the choice not to go to the far south, but I had a great time in the parts I did see.
Tell you what though, 90% of Patagonia is really, really, really boring.
![]() |
This is an exciting picture. It has a power pole! |
I had images of the Andes in my head when I first headed south, and was very disappointed when the sun rose on my first long haul bus to see endless scrubby plains for hours on end. And it was the same everywhere else. Once you got into the mountains things picked up again, but you trade that view for a longer journey time winding through those roads.
![]() |
This is more like it |
It's such a wild and inhospitable place that even the greediest European settlers all but gave up on colonising the area until the late 19th century. The area was named after the 'Patagons', giants reportedly found in the area and given a name from a classical legend. It's likely they just encountered some of the fairly tall Tehuelche natives: not giants by any means, but at over 6 feet, much taller than your average European of the time.
Overall, I would say that Patagonia was a great way to start the trip. However, I am annoyed that I ended up leaving some of the best stones unturned. In my head I am already planning another trip there, starting in Rio or BA but carrying a tent, winter gear and camp stove for a serious hiking adventure. Who's with me?
Comments
Post a Comment